Sonarworks reference 4 free free#
There are for sure pros and cons of each approach - with main benefit of automatic commercial DRC SW being relative ease of use and hopefully somewhat repeatable results without the user needing to learn a whole lot about acoustics and EQ.įor sure I would advise anyone to use free solutions first (like REW and EAPO), learn a bit about it all and then maybe even make some comparisons to DRCs which offer trial/demo modes. However, that is not really my position - I'm not even sure at this point whether I personally will go for any off-the-shelf DRC solution. However my last attempt calculating EQ with REW was a little while ago and I feel I've learned quite a bit about the topic since then - so maybe now I'd have better results following that approachĮDIT: Just thought a bit about my recent posts and realized one could read them as being very favorable towards commercial DRC solutions and dismissive of REW + EQ approach for room correction. For instance, in my opinion it is less-than-trivial to know which dips to EQ and by how much from just the multi-point average curve - REW automatic target match feature doesn't seem to take this into account - so to me that means the user needs to have some experience and do some trial-and-error.Īutomatic DRCs seem to have some algorithm to take this into account - for instance notice how Dirac Live and ARC 3 calculated very similar correction curves for me in the 45-210Hz range, although the two use a different number and spatial distribution of measurement points.
Sonarworks reference 4 free manual#
I tried with both automatic generation of EQ filter coefficients that REW does to match a target curve as well as creating manual filter banks and didn't like the results either way (on this system).
0 kommentar(er)
